- I can write a claim based on reasons and relevant evidence from the text. (W.6.1a)
- I can plan a collaborative argument essay about why Mary's or Katherine's accomplishments are remarkable. (W.6.1, W.6.5)
Focus Standards: These are the standards the instruction addresses.
- RI.6.1, RI.6.3, W.6.1, W.6.5, W.6.9b
Supporting Standards: These are the standards that are incidental—no direct instruction in this lesson, but practice of these standards occurs as a result of addressing the focus standards.
- RI.6.10, W.6.4, W.6.10
Daily Learning Targets
Ongoing Assessment
- Opening A: Entrance Ticket: Unit 3, Lesson 2 (W.6.1, W.6.5, W.6.10)
- Work Time B: Collaborative Argument Writing Plan graphic organizer (RI.6.1, RI.6.3, W.6.1, W.6.4, W.6.5, W.6.9b, W.6.10)
- Closing and Assessment A: Argument Writing Checklist (W.6.1)
Agenda
Agenda | Teaching Notes |
---|---|
1. Opening A. Engage the Learner - W.6.1 (5 minutes) 2. Work Time A. Write a Claim for a Collaborative Argument Essay - W.6.1a (10 minutes) B. Plan a Collaborative Argument Essay - W.6.1, W.6.5 (25 minutes) 3. Closing and Assessment A. Debrief: Argument Writing Checklist - W.6.1 (5 minutes) 4. Homework A. Plan a Collaborative Literary Argument Essay: Students work to complete their assigned section of the Collaborative Argument Writing Plan graphic organizer. B. Independent Research Reading: Students read for at least 20 minutes in their independent research reading text. Then they select a prompt and write a response in their independent reading journal. |
Alignment to Assessment Standards and Purpose of Lesson
Opportunities to Extend Learning
How It Builds on Previous Work
Support All Students
Assessment Guidance
Down the Road
|
In Advance
- Strategically group students into pairs to plan and write the collaborative essay focused on either Mary Jackson or Katherine Johnson.
- Review the content in the Model Argument Evidence: Dorothy note-catcher and Model Argument Essay: "Dorothy" in preparation for guiding students to see how these documents are connected to each other and how these documents combine to provide support in the students' writing.
- Review the student tasks and example answers to get familiar with what students will be required to do in the lesson (see Materials list).
- Prepare copies of handouts for students, including entrance ticket (see Materials list).
- Post the learning targets and applicable anchor charts (see Materials list).
Tech and Multimedia
- Work Time B: Students may prefer to complete their Collaborative Argument Writing Plan graphic organizer using a word-processing tool such as http://eled.org/0158.
Supporting English Language Learners
Supports guided in part by CA ELD Standards 6.I.A.1, 6.I.A.2, 6.I.C.10, 6.I.C.11, 6.I.C.12, 6.II.A.1, 6.II.A.2, 6.II.B.3, 6.II.B.4, 6.II.B.5, 6.II.C.6, and 6.II.C.7.
Important Points in the Lesson Itself
- To support ELLs, this lesson guides students through the steps of planning their collaborative argument essays. Students have the opportunity to review the Collaborative Argument Evidence note-catcher, where they have been collecting textual information since Unit 2. Then, in their pairs, they compare note-catchers, add details to strengthen their arguments, and draft a claim statement. This process of carefully reviewing notes with a partner before drafting the main claim of the essay is beneficial for all students, but especially ELLs, as this builds more time into the planning process and invites thoughtful collaboration.
- ELLs may find it challenging to collaboratively plan an essay during Work Time B, even though they completed similar tasks in Modules 1-3. Take the time to pair students very strategically, taking into consideration English-language proficiency, writing abilities, and general rapport. Note that pairing students with very disparate English-language needs (e.g., a student who needs heavier language support and one who needs much lighter support) might not be the most appropriate or effective way to support students. Instead, try to pair students with similar levels of English-level proficiency, but with distinct skills (e.g., a stronger reader with a stronger writer). Help students develop collaborative strategies that work for them and their partners (e.g., negotiating ideas aloud before writing them independently, writing independently first and then comparing notes and adding or modifying note-catchers as needed, designating alternating "scribes" to take notes or sketch as the other student shares ideas aloud).
Vocabulary
- N/A
Materials from Previous Lessons
Teacher
Student
- Painted Model Argument Essay (example for teacher reference) (from Module 4, Unit 3, Lesson 1, Work Time A)
- Annotated Model Argument Essay (example for teacher reference) (from Module 4, Unit 3, Lesson 1, Work Time A)
- Work to Become Ethical People anchor chart (one for display; from Module 1, Unit 1, Lesson 1, Work Time C)
- Work to Become Effective Learners anchor chart (one for display; from Module 1, Unit 1, Lesson 5, Work Time A)
- Work to Contribute to a Better World anchor chart (one for display; from Module 1, Unit 3, Lesson 8, Closing and Assessment A)
- Collaborative Argument Evidence note-catcher (example for teacher reference) (from Module 4, Unit 2, Lesson 9, Work Time A)
- Model Argument Essay: "Dorothy" (one per student; from Module 4, Unit 3, Lesson 1, Work Time A)
- Collaborative Argument Evidence note-catcher (one per student; from Module 4, Unit 2, Lesson 9, Opening A)
- Independent reading journal (one per student; begun in Module 1, Unit 1, Lesson 6, Work Time B)
New Materials
Teacher
Student
- Entrance Ticket: Unit 3, Lesson 2 (example for teacher reference)
- Argument Writing checklist (example for teacher reference)
- Collaborative Argument Writing Plan graphic organizer (example for teacher reference)
- Entrance Ticket: Unit 3, Lesson 2 (one per student)
- Argument Writing checklist (one per student)
- Collaborative Argument Writing Plan graphic organizer (one per student)
Assessment
Each unit in the 6-8 Language Arts Curriculum has two standards-based assessments built in, one mid-unit assessment and one end of unit assessment. The module concludes with a performance task at the end of Unit 3 to synthesize students' understanding of what they accomplished through supported, standards-based writing.
Opening
Opening |
---|
A. Engage the Learner - W.6.1 (5 minutes)
|
Work Time
Work Time | Levels of Support |
---|---|
A. Write a Claim for a Collaborative Argument Essay - W.6.1a (10 minutes)
"I can write a claim based on reasons and relevant evidence from the text."
|
For Lighter Support
For Heavier Support
|
B. Plan a Collaborative Argument Essay - W.6.1, W.6.5 (25 minutes)
"I can plan a collaborative argument essay about why Mary's or Katherine's accomplishments are remarkable."
|
|
Closing & Assessments
Closing |
---|
A. Debrief: Argument Writing Checklist - W.6.1 (5 minutes)
"Look at the second column. Are there any specific criteria you should be aware of specifically for this collaborative essay?" (The claim includes the name of my assigned figure and states why her accomplishments are remarkable. The claim includes two specific points to support the claim. The points come from the anchor text, research sources, or other supplementary texts we read in class.)
|
Homework
Homework |
---|
A. Plan a Collaborative Literary Argument Essay
B. Independent Research Reading
|
Copyright © 2013-2024 by EL Education, New York, NY.