Agenda | Teaching Notes |
---|---|
Total Time: 4 hours of instruction Section 1 1. Engineering Design Cycle A. Introducing the Challenge (10 minutes) B. Imagining: Specialized Structures for the Animal (15 minutes) C. Planning: The General Shape of the Animal (30 minutes) D. Praise, Question, Suggestion: The General Shape of the Animal (15 minutes) Optional Extension: Focused Art Lesson E. Creating: The Details of the Animal (30 minutes) F. Praise, Question, Suggestion: The Details of the Animal (10 minutes) G. Revising: The Final Drawing of the Animal (35 minutes) Optional Extension: Additional Rounds of Peer Critique Section 2 1. Developing and Using Models A. Labeling the Explanatory Model (15 minutes) 2. Engaging in Argument A. Scientists Meetings: Making Meaning (20 minutes) B. Analyzing a Model Survival Argument (15 minutes) C. Summative Assessment: Survival Argument (30 minutes) Section 3 1. Communicating Information A. Reflecting on Learning (5 minutes) B. Celebrating Learning (10 minutes) Optional Extension: Dim Award Ceremony |
Purpose of lesson sequence and alignment with NGSS standards:
How it builds on previous work in the Life Science Module:
How it connects to the CCSS Standards and EL Education's Language Arts Grade 4 Module 2:
Possible student misconceptions:
Possible broader connections:
Areas where students may need additional support:
Down the road: N/A |
Lesson Sequence 11: Overview
Total Time: 4 hours of instruction (divided into three sections, with Section 1 taking place over the course of multiple class meetings)
This is the final lesson of the module. Students use the engineering design cycle to create an explanatory model of a fictional but realistic animal and a drawing of the specific ecosystem in which the animal lives. Students then complete an on-demand summative assessment in which they argue that their designed animal has the necessary internal and eternal structures to survive well in either the grassland, desert, or tundra ecosystem. Finally, students reflect on the module and celebrate their learning by sharing their designed animals with an authentic audience such as their first-grade reviewers.
Long-Term Learning Addressed (Based on NGSS)
Construct an argument of how the internal and external structure of both plants and animals function together as a system to help them survive well in a given ecosystem. (Based on NGSS 4-LS1-1)
This lesson sequence explicitly addresses the following:
Science and Engineering Practices:
- Developing and Using Models: Develop a model or simple physical prototype to convey a proposed object, tool, or process. Students design a fictional but realistic animal with specialized structures that help the animal thrive in a particular ecosystem based on evidence they have collected throughout the module. Note: This Science and Engineering Practice is not explicitly aligned with 4-LS1-1.
- Engaging in Argument from Evidence: Construct and/or support an argument with evidence, data, and/or a model. Students support the claim that their designed animal will survive well in a specific habitat using the explanatory model of their animal and evidence collected throughout the module.
Crosscutting Concepts:
- Structure and Function: The way in which a living thing is shaped and its substructures determine its properties and function. Students design an animal with specialized structures that will help it survive and thrive in a particular ecosystem. Note: This Crosscutting Concept is not explicitly aligned with 4-LS1-1.
- Systems and System Models: A system can be described in terms of its components and their interactions. Students describe how the structures of their designed animal work together as a system for survival.
Disciplinary Core Ideas:
- LS1.A Structure and Function: Plants and animals have both internal and external structures that serve various functions in growth, survival, behavior, and reproduction. Students design an animal with specialized structures and construct an argument that the animal they created and the plants they chose have structures that will enable the organism to thrive in a particular ecosystem.
Lesson Sequence Learning Targets
- I can imagine and plan a realistic animal that has internal and external structures that help it to survive in a specific ecosystem.
- I can critique my partner's animal design and provide kind, helpful, and specific feedback.
- I can create an explanatory model of my animal and the plants that surround it that explains how structures work together to support survival.
- I can construct an argument to defend why my animal's specialized structures will allow it to survive in its ecosystem.
Ongoing Assessment
- Scientists Meeting: Making Meaning
- Performance Task: Animal Design Challenge Explanatory Model
- Summative Assessment: Survival Argument
Agenda
In Advance
- Read each section and complete the Preparing to Teach: Self-Coaching Guide.
- Decide on an authentic audience for presenting the designed animals. Consider using first-grade students, local biologists, zoologists, upper-grade students, or parents.
- Consider meeting with the art teacher or other teachers with artistic experience to talk about ways to support students as they draw their animals.
- Decide whether to have students draw the plants for their performance task or to give them a printout of the plant (which would result in multimedia collage). Use the plant cards from Lesson Sequence 2 as images or to support students as they draw.
- Determine how best to have students co-construct the rubric for the performance task in Section 1. Decide whether students will fill in all four columns or if you will complete the rubric based on student ideas and your own grading requirements.
- Prepare technology necessary to play "Austin's Butterfly" and "Inspiring Excellence Part 4."
- Gather the materials for the design challenge in Section 1.
- Review the Praise, Question, Suggestion protocol (see the Classroom Protocols pack).
- For more information on the purpose of peer critique, watch the entirety of "Inspiring Excellence Part 4"; watch for suggestions for ways to structure peer critique.
- Post: Lesson sequence learning targets, Scientists Do These Things anchor chart, Concepts Scientists Think About anchor chart, Animal Structures and Functions anchor chart, Plant Structures and Functions anchor chart, Norms of a Scientists Meeting anchor chart, and Life Science Module guiding question.
Optional extensions:
- Focused Art Lesson: Invite an art teacher or animator to come in and give a specific lesson to the students.
- Additional Rounds of Peer Critique: Allow students to work with multiple peers to give and receive feedback to continue to improve the quality of their explanatory model.
- Dim Award Ceremony: Have the class (or the authentic audience) award a Dim Award to the student or team of students who had the most realistic animal.
Vocabulary
N/A
Materials
General Materials
- Performance Task: Animal Design Challenge Explanatory Model (from Lesson Sequence 1)
- Designed Animal and Plant Setting Rubric (one per student and one to display; co-constructed with students during Section 1)
- Designed Animal and Plant Setting Rubric (for teacher reference)
- Student science notebook (from Lesson Sequence 1; one per student)
- Explanatory Model and Survival Argument entry (page 62 of the student science notebook)
- Animal Structures and Functions anchor chart (begun in Lesson Sequence 3)
- "Austin's Butterfly" (video; play in entirety)
- Animal cards (optional; from Lesson Sequence 2)
- Plant cards (optional; from Lesson Sequence 2)
- "Inspiring Excellence Part 4" (optional; video; play from 3:00-4:00)
- Peer Critique Checklist (two per student)
- Scientists Do These Things anchor chart (begun in Lesson Sequence 2)
- Plant Structures and Functions anchor chart (begun in Lesson Sequence 7)
- Norms of a Scientists Meeting anchor chart (begun in Lesson Sequence 1)
- Life Science Module guiding question (from Lesson Sequence 1; one to display)
- Teacher science notebook (from Lesson Sequence 1; one for teacher use)
- Concepts Scientists Think About anchor chart (begun in Lesson Sequence 2)
- Model survival argument (one per student and one to display)
- Summative Assessment graphic organizer (one per student and one to display)
- Summative Assessment: Survival Argument (one per student)
Science-Specific Materials
- Sticky notes (optional; 10 per student; for students to use during Section 1 and Section 2)
- Timer (optional; for teacher to use during Section 1)
- Materials for Animal Design Challenge Explanatory Model (enough for every student)
- 8.5" x 11" blank paper
- Colored pencils
- Fine-tipped pen
- permanent black marker
Work Time
Work Time | Preparing to Teach: Self-Coaching Guide |
---|---|
Section 1: Engineering Design CycleA. Introducing the Challenge (10 minutes)
"What does a designed animal need to have in order to be realistic?" (Structures that come from real animals.) "How can you convince someone that your animal can survive in a specific ecosystem?" (Include specialized structures that animals from that ecosystem really have.) "What makes something high-quality?" (Has had multiple drafts and revisions, is neat and well crafted)
|
(1) What authentic audience makes sense for my classroom? (See Teaching Notes for suggestions.) (2) What do I expect my students to say? What additional requirements do I want to have on the rubric? (3) If my students didn't participate in Lesson Sequence 10, what additional support will they need with the Engineering Design Cycle? |
B. Imagining: Specialized Structures for the Animal (15 minutes)
"What functions are necessary for an animal to survive well enough to reproduce?" (obtain food, move (or stay stationary and blend in) including for protection/defense, sense environment, regulate temperature)
|
(1) How can I support students as they imagine the possible structures they could include? What visuals might be helpful? |
C. Planning: The General Shape of the Animal (30 minutes)
"Based on the video, what was most important about the process that Austin went through to create his butterfly?" (Responses will vary: revising, receiving feedback.) "What might you consider borrowing from Austin's creation process to include in your own?" (Responses will vary.)
|
(1) Based on the explanatory models from Lesson Sequences 5, 7, and 8, what will my students likely struggle with? (2) Based on the peer critique in Lesson Sequences 5 and 7, how positively do my students view peer critique? How can I use this video to help them have a vision of the power of peer critique? (3) How can I best support my students as they begin planning the general shape of their animals? |
D. Praise, Question, Suggestion: The General Shape of the Animal (15 minutes)
|
(1) How well did my students do with peer critique in Lesson Sequences 5 and 7? What additional support will they need? (2) What are our norms for peer critique? (Suggestions: Be helpful, be kind, be specific.) (3) Will I designate peer critique partners, or allow students to choose their own partners? Will it be helpful to have students pair up with someone from the same ecosystem group? (4) What colleague or expert in my community might be able to give a focused art lesson at this point? |
E. Creating: The Details of the Animal (30 minutes)
|
(1) How can I help students add more detail to their drawing? |
F. Praise, Question, Suggestion: The Details of the Animal (10 minutes)
|
(1) Would additional rounds of peer critique be helpful for my students? |
G. Revising: The Final Drawing of the Animal (35 minutes)
|
(1) How can I help the students make a final project that they are proud of? |
Section 2: Developing and Using ModelsA. Labeling the Explanatory Model (15 minutes)
"What do you need to add to your drawings to make them an explanatory model, and to make sure they explain how your designed animal will survive?" (labels and details)
|
(1) Based on the explanatory model I have assessed in the student science notebooks, where will my students need additional support? (2) Most students will benefit from using sticky notes to add the labels. That way they can do multiple drafts of the labels without ruining their final drawing. (3) How else can I support them as they create this final product? |
Section 2: Engaging in ArgumentA. Scientists Meetings: Making Meaning (20 minutes)
"How would you answer the module guiding question?" (Responses will vary.)
"Why do you think ...?" "What is your reason ...?" "What made you change your explanation?"
"Can someone paraphrase what X said?" "Who thinks something similar to what X thinks?" "Who thinks something different from what X thinks?" "Can you add to what X said?"
"What is a system?" "What is the relationship between structure and function?"
"Where might you find evidence for what you have been learning?" (in science notebooks and on classroom anchor charts)
|
(1) How well have my students kept the norms of Scientists Meetings? How can I encourage them to further build on one another's ideas? (2) Did I record the initial Scientists Meeting in Lesson Sequence 1? How will I share this with the students now? |
B. Analyzing a Model Survival Argument (15 minutes)
"How did the author of the model argument explain whether he or she had enough evidence?" (talked about how the animal will get food and stay safe from predators)
"Do you think the author has enough strong evidence to support his or her claim?" (Responses will vary.)
|
(1) Some students may benefit from seeing an annotated version of the model paragraph. How will I make this available to them? (2) Based on the arguments that students have constructed in Lesson Sequences 2, 6, and 8, what additional support do students need to successfully write the assessment? |
C. Summative Assessment: Survival Argument (30 minutes)
"You should defend why your animal will survive in the desert, grassland, or tundra." "Be sure to explain what evidence you have for making this claim, and discuss whether or not you have enough quality evidence for making this claim."
|
(1) Some of my students may benefit from an additional copy of the Summative Assessment graphic organizer to scaffold their paragraph writing. For which students might this extra step be helpful? (2) Alternatively, some students may prefer to construct their argument orally. The Summative Assessment graphic organizer can help scaffold an oral argument as well. Which of my students may benefit from this option? |
Section 3: Communicating InformationA. Reflecting on Learning (5 minutes)
"What is the most interesting new learning about structures and functions in an organism from this module?"
|
(1) Will I capture this information in a public and visible way? |
B. Celebrating Learning (10 minutes)
|
(1) How can I ensure students have an authentic audience for this task? (See Teaching Notes for suggestions.) |
Copyright © 2013-2024 by EL Education, New York, NY.
Next Generation Science Standards © Copyright 2013. NGSS Lead States. All rights reserved. “Next Generation Science Standards” is a registered trademark of Achieve. Neither Achieve nor the lead states and partners that developed the Next Generation Science Standards were involved in the production of this product, and do not endorse it. Next Generation Science Standards are subject to the public license located at https://www.nextgenscience.org/trademark-and-copyright.