- I can determine two or more central ideas and analyze their development over the course of Trash Vortex. (RI.7.2)
- I can determine an author's point of view and purpose in Trash Vortex. (RI.7.6)
- I can analyze how the author of Trash Vortex distinguishes her position from that of others. (RI.7.6)
Focus Standards: These are the standards the instruction addresses.
- RI.7.2, RI.7.6, SL.7.2
Supporting Standards: These are the standards that are incidental—no direct instruction in this lesson, but practice of these standards occurs as a result of addressing the focus standards.
- RI.7.1, RI.7.4, L.7.4
Daily Learning Targets
Ongoing Assessment
- Opening A: Entrance Ticket: Unit 1, Lesson 11 (SL.7.2)
- Work Time A: Author's Point of View and Purpose: Trash Vortex, Chapter 4 note-catcher (RI.7.6)
Agenda
Agenda | Teaching Notes |
---|---|
1. Opening A. Engage the Learner - SL.7.2 (10 minutes) 2. Work Time A. Read and Analyze Trash Vortex - RI.7.6 (25 minutes) 3. Closing and Assessment A. Collaborative Discussion: Author's Point of View and Purpose - RI.7.6 (10 minutes) 4. Homework A. Analyze Point of View and Purpose: Students complete Homework: Analyze Point of View and Purpose: Trash Vortex, Pages 44-49 by answering questions about the author's point of view, purpose, and how she distinguishes her position from others in Trash Vortex. B. Independent Research Reading: Students read for at least 20 minutes in their independent research reading text. Then they select a prompt and write a response in their independent reading journal. |
Alignment to Assessment Standards and Purpose of Lesson
Opportunities to Extend Learning
How It Builds on Previous Work
Support All Students
Assessment Guidance
Down the Road
|
In Advance
- Ensure there is a copy of Entrance Ticket: Unit 1, Lesson 11 at each student's workspace.
- Preread pages 44-49 of Trash Vortex prior to this lesson.
- Prepare
- a section of the cover of the book to zoom in on, using technology,
- partnerships for the Close Viewing protocol, and
- small groups for the Collaborative Discussion protocol.
- Post the learning targets and applicable anchor charts (see Materials list).
Tech and Multimedia
- Opening A: Display the cover of Trash Vortex and zoom in on one particular aspect of the image.
- Work Time A: Audio recording of Trash Vortex, and devices to play the audio and headphones, as needed.
- Work Time B: Recording devices to record collaborative discussions.
Supporting English Language Learners
Supports guided in part by CA ELD Standards 7.I.A.1, 7.I.B.5, 7.I.B.6, and 7.I.C.10.
Important Points in the Lesson Itself
- To support ELLs, this lesson provides students the same routines and note-catcher they have used throughout the unit to independently analyze the central ideas and the author's point of view and purpose in the anchor text Trash Vortex.
- ELLs may find it challenging to gradually release from small group work to independent analysis of the anchor text. If so, draw these students together into a small group and guide them to grapple independently with each section of the note-catcher. Then review their responses before they move on to grapple independently with the next section of the note-catcher. Doing so will allow students to check their responses and ensure their comprehension before they get too far off track. At the end of Work Time A, collect students' note-catchers in order to review them as a formative assessment to ensure students are ready for the end of unit assessment in the following lesson. If not, spend another lesson on analyzing the central ideas and author's point of view and purpose.
Vocabulary
- expedition (A)
Key
(A): Academic Vocabulary
(DS): Domain-Specific Vocabulary
Materials from Previous Lessons
Teacher
Student
- Text Guide: Trash Vortex (for teacher reference) (from Module 4, Unit 1, Lesson A, Work Time B)
- Gists: Trash Vortex (example for teacher reference) (from Module 4, Unit 1, Lesson 8, Work Time A)
- Discussion Norms anchor chart (one for display; from Module 1, Unit 1, Lesson 13, Work Time C)
- Trash Vortex by Danielle Smith-Llera (text; one per student; from Module 4, Unit 1, Lesson 8, Work Time B)
- Vocabulary log (one per student; from Module 1, Unit 1, Lesson 2, Work Time B)
- Quote Accurately from the Text (one per student; from Module 1, Unit 1, Lesson 14, Work Time B)
- Independent reading journal (one per student; begun in Module 1, Unit 1, Lesson 6, Work Time B)
New Materials
Teacher
Student
- Entrance Ticket: Unit 1, Lesson 11 (example for teacher reference)
- Author's Point of View and Purpose: Trash Vortex, Chapter 4 note-catcher (example for teacher reference)
- Homework: Analyze Point of View and Purpose: Trash Vortex, Pages 44-49 (answers for teacher reference) (see Homework Resources)
- Entrance Ticket: Unit 1, Lesson 11 (one per student)
- Synopsis: Trash Vortex, Pages 44–49 (optional; one per student)
- Author’s Point of View and Purpose: Trash Vortex, Chapter 4 note-catcher (one per student)
- Author’s Point of View and Purpose: Trash Vortex, Chapter 4 note-catcher ▲
- Recording devices (one per group)
- Audio devices (one per student)
- Homework: Analyze Point of View and Purpose: Trash Vortex, Pages 44–49 (one per student; see Homework Resources)
Assessment
Each unit in the 6-8 Language Arts Curriculum has two standards-based assessments built in, one mid-unit assessment and one end of unit assessment. The module concludes with a performance task at the end of Unit 3 to synthesize students' understanding of what they accomplished through supported, standards-based writing.
Opening
Opening | Levels of Support |
---|---|
A. Engage the Learner - SL.7.2 (10 minutes)
"Which details did you notice?" (Answers will vary.) "What did you learn or infer from those details?" (Answers will vary.)
|
For Lighter Support
For Heavier Support
|
Work Time
Work Time | Levels of Support |
---|---|
A. Read and Analyze Trash Vortex – RI.7.6 (25 minutes)
“I can determine two or more central ideas and analyze their development over the course of Trash Vortex.” “I can determine an author’s point of view and purpose in Trash Vortex.” “I can analyze how the author of Trash Vortex distinguishes her position from that of others.”
“What habits of character did you see in this excerpt? Who demonstrated them? What did they look/sound like?” (Possible response: the scientists and experts interviewed demonstrate contributing to a better world by applying their learning to help the environment.)
“What is the gist of this excerpt?” (There are many solutions for solving plastic pollution problem.) As necessary, consult the Gists: Trash Vortex (example for teacher reference) document. “What are the central ideas in this excerpt?” (One main way to reduce plastic pollution is to figure out how to get plastic to biodegrade. Another way to reduce plastic pollution is by reusing and recycling.) If students have trouble identifying the central ideas, ask: “What main kinds of solutions does the author share in this excerpt?” ▲ “What are some of the ways the author develops the central ideas in this excerpt?” (The author explains how scientists study plastic-eating organisms and are creating new kinds of biodegradable plastic. The author tells the story of Plastiki, the “bottle craft,” and quotes from experts about reusing and recycling.) If students have trouble identifying the details, ask: “What important details, facts, or examples does the author use to tell us about the main solutions for reducing plastic pollution?” ▲
“What is the author’s overall point of view and purpose in this excerpt? Why does she discuss so many solutions to the plastic pollution problem? Does she favor one solution over another?” (Her overall purpose and position is to explain that there are many different solutions to the plastic pollution problem. She doesn’t seem to favor one over another.) “What different perspectives does she include in this excerpt? How does she distinguish each perspective from the others?” (She includes scientists’ perspectives that biodegradable plastic is a good solution. She quotes the scientists and explains the process. Then she quotes other scientists and environmentalists who directly disagree with the biodegradable plastic. She quotes them explaining how recycling and reusing plastic is a better solution.)
|
For Lighter Support
For Heavier Support
|
Closing & Assessments
Closing | Levels of Support |
---|---|
A. Collaborative Discussion: Author’s Point of View and Purpose – RI.7.6 (10 minutes)
“I can determine an author’s point of view and purpose in Trash Vortex.”
“What is Danielle Smith-Llera’s purpose in pages 44–49 of Trash Vortex? How can you tell? What is her overall point of view?” (For more examples, see the Author’s Point of View and Purpose: Trash Vortex, Chapter 4 note-catcher.)
“Are there other examples of the author’s purpose in these pages? What other points of view does she include? How does she distinguish their points of view from each other?” ▲
|
For Lighter Support
For Heavier Support
|
Homework
Homework | Levels of Support |
---|---|
A. Analyze Point of View and Purpose
B. Independent Research Reading
|
For Lighter Support
For Heavier Support
|
Copyright © 2013-2024 by EL Education, New York, NY.